In other words, to extend the pleasure that God has in His own name, He calls out a people to enjoy and praise and proclaim that name. The Bible calls these people "the elect," "the chosen."
John Piper
In other words, to extend the pleasure that God has in His own name, He calls out a people to enjoy and praise and proclaim that name. The Bible calls these people "the elect," "the chosen."
John Piper
Here is Commentary by John Stott.
Paul reaches back in his mind *before the foundation of the world*
(verse 4), before creation, before time began, into a past eternity in
which only God himself existed in the perfection of his being.
In that pre-creation eternity God did something. He formed a
purpose in his mind. This purpose concerned both *Christ* (his only
begotten Son) and *us* (whom he proposed to make his adopted sons and
indeed daughters, for of course the word embraces both sexes). Mark
well the statement: *he chose us in him*. The juxtaposition of the
three pronouns is emphatic. God put us and Christ together in his
mind. He determined to make us (who did not yet exist) his own
children through the redeeming work of Christ (which had not yet taken
place). It was a definite decision, for the verb *he chose
(exelexato)* is another aorist. It also arose from his entirely
unmerited favour, since he chose us *that we should holy and blameless
before him*, which indicates that we, when in his mind he chose us,
were unholy and blameworthy, and therefore deserving not of adoption
but of judgment. Further (Paul repeats the same truth in different
words), *he destined us in love (1) to be his sons through Jesus
Christ, according to the purpose of his will, to the praise of his
glorious grace which he freely bestowed on us in the Beloved (verses
5-6).
Now everybody finds the doctrine of election difficult. 'Didn't I
choose God?' someone asks indignantly; to which we must answer 'Yes,
indeed you did, and freely, but only because in eternity God had first
chosen you.' 'Didn't I decide for Christ?' asks somebody else; to
which we must reply 'Yes, indeed you did, and freely, but only because
in eternity God had first decided for you.'
Scripture nowhere dispels the mystery of election, and we should
beware of any who try to systematize it too precisely or rigidly. It
is not likely that we shall discover a simple solution to a problem
which has baffled the best brains of Christendom for centuries. But
here at least in our text are three important truths to grasp and
remember:
a). The doctrine of election is a divine revelation, not a human speculation.
It was not invented by Augustine of Hippo or Calvin of Geneva. On
the contrary, it is without question a biblical doctrine, and no
biblical Christian can ignore it. According to the Old Testament, God
chose Israel out of all the nations of the world to be his special
people (e.g. 'you shall be my own possession among all peoples.
Ex.19:4-6; cf.Dt.7:6ff.; Is.42:1 and 43:1). According to the New
Testament he is choosing an international community to be his 'saints'
(verse 1), his holy or special people (cf. 1 Pet.2:9-10). So we must
not reject the notion of election as if it were a weird fantasy of
men, but rather humbly accept it (even though we do not fully
understand it)as a truth which God himself has revealed. It seems
natural that at this point we should seek help from Calvin. He
preached through Ephesians, from the pulpit of St Peter's church,
Geneva, in forty-eight sermons beginning on 1 May 1558. Here is one of
his comments: 'Although we cannot conceive either by argument or
reason how God has elected us before the creation of the world, yet we
know it by his declaring it to us; and experience itself vouches for
it sufficiently, when we are enlightened in the faith'.
----------------------------- Note -------------------------
(1). AV, RV, and NEB put the expression 'in love' immediately after
'holy and blameless before him', because they understand it as
referring to the love which God wants to see in us. Thus holiness is
defined in terms of love. This may well be the correct translation
since the words 'in love' occur in five more contexts of Ephesians and
in each case describe Christian people (3:17; 4:2, 15, 16; 5:2). RSV,
however, attaches the words to the verb 'destined us' because it
understands them as referring to God's love, not ours. I myself favour
this interpretation because the context appears to be emphasizing love
as the source rather than the result of our election.
--John Stott, in his commentary on Ephesians
(The other 2 truths in the text will be posted later)
Spurgeon
Electing love has selected some of
the worst of men to be made the best.
Pebbles of the brook Grace turn into
jewels for the Savior's crown. Worthless
dross he transforms into pure gold.
Redeeming love has set apart many of
the worst of mankind to be the reward
of the Savior's passion and death.
Effectual grace calls forth many of the vilest
of the vile to sit at the table of mercy."
Spurgeon
Reprobation is the name given to God’s eternal decision regarding those sinners whom he has not chosen for life. His decision is in essence a decision not to change them, as the elect are destined to be changed, but to leave them to sin as in their hearts they already want to do, and finally to judge them as they deserve for what they have done. When in particular instances God gives them over to their sins (i.e., removes restraints on their doing the disobedient things they desire), this is itself the beginning of judgment. It is called “hardening” (Rom. 9:18; 11:25; cf. Ps. 81:12; Rom. 1:24, 26, 28), and it inevitably leads to greater guilt.
Reprobation is a biblical reality (Rom. 9:14-24; 1 Pet. 2:8), but not one that bears directly on Christian behavior. The reprobates are faceless so far as Christians are concerned, and it is not for us to try to identify them. Rather, we should live in light of the certainty that anyone may be saved if he or she will but repent and put faith in Christ.
We should view all persons that we meet as possibly being numbered among the elect.
--JI Packer, read the whole article here
For [God] says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” It does not, therefore, depend on man’s desire or effort, but on God’s mercy. ROMANS 9:15-16
The verb elect means “to select, or choose out.” The biblical doctrine of election is that before Creation God selected out of the human race, foreseen as fallen, those whom he would redeem, bring to faith, justify, and glorify in and through Jesus Christ (Rom. 8:28-39; Eph. 1:3-14; 2 Thess. 2:13-14; 2 Tim. 1:9-10).
This divine choice is an expression of free and sovereign grace, for it is unconstrained and unconditional, not merited by anything in those who are its subjects. God owes sinners no mercy of any kind, only condemnation; so it is a wonder, and matter for endless praise, that he should choose to save any of us; and doubly so when his choice involved the giving of his own Son to suffer as sin-bearer for the elect (Rom. 8:32).
I was blown away by the vigor these kids showed. It was obvious that they are growing up in a day and setting where this is front and center and "accepted by all".
I meant to say that we as humans regularly adopt values without checking them with Scripture...and did NOT mean to communicate that 2nd graders being "green" was to be shunned.
W'minster Shorter Catechism, 13-19
W'minster Larger Catechism, 21-29
After being rescued from captivity in Iraq and experiencing firsthand the corrupt methods of Saddam Hussein, one American hostage remarked, "Despite all that I endured I never lost my confidence in the basic goodness of people." Perhaps this view rests in part on a sliding scale of the relative goodness or wickedness of people. Obviously some people are far more wicked than others. Next to Saddam Hussein or Adolf Hitler the ordinary run-of-the-mill sinner looks like a saint. But if we lift our gaze to the ultimate standard of goodness - the holy character of God - we realize that what appears to be a basic goodness on an earthly level is corrupt to the core..
The Bible teaches the total depravity of the human race. Total depravity means radical corruption. We must be careful to note the difference between total depravity and "utter" depravity. To be utterly depraved is to be as wicked as one could possibly be. Hitler was extremely depraved, but he could have been worse than he was. I am sinner. Yet I could sin more often and more severely than I actually do. I am not utterly depraved, but I am totally depraved. For total depravity means that I and everyone else are
depraved or corrupt in the totality of our being. There is no part of us that is left untouched by sin. Our minds, our wills, and our bodies are affected by evil. We speak sinful words, do sinful deeds, have impure thoughts. Our very bodies suffer from the ravages of sin.
It is precisely here that a true theology of tragedy can begin to take shape. The notion that Christianity is somehow alien to tragedy—that it is simply and straightforwardly “comic” because the resurrection makes for a happy ending—could not be more radically wrong. In his essay “Tragedy and Christian Faith,” Hans Urs von Balthasar singles out three essential elements of tragedy: that the good things of the world cannot sustain themselves and are lost; that this places us in a position of contradiction or alienation; and that this condition is bound up with an “opaque guilt,” in which individual moral responsibility cannot account for all suffering, leaving us subject to a mysterious “inherited curse.”
According to von Balthasar, Christ does not banish tragedy but carries it into the heart of God. Christ “fulfills the contradiction of existence...not by dissolving the contradiction but by bearing that affirmation of the human condition as it is through still deeper darknesses in finem, ‘to the end,’ as love....”